![]() Protocols, link icon for, Beginning Substring Attribute Value Selector Proposed Recommendation status, CSS3 Is Modular Prefix for, Let’s Get Started: Introducing the Syntax Potential problems from unprefixed, Browser-Specific Prefixes Moving between states, Transitions and Animations Properties, Let’s Get Started: Introducing the Syntax, Browser-Specific Prefixes, empty, More Font Properties, More Font Properties, Transitions and Animations Preserve-3d keyword, for transform-style property, Transform Style Prefixes, Let’s Get Started: Introducing the Syntax, Let’s Get Started: Introducing the Syntax, Browser-Specific Prefixesīrowser-specific, Browser-Specific Prefixesįor properties, Let’s Get Started: Introducing the Syntax Position, of background images, Background Size Position property, for creating rows, Template Layout Portrait value, for orientation Media Feature, Using Media Queries in the Real World Pixels, for axes measurement, Text Effects and Typographic Styles ![]() Pixel grid, Understanding Axes and Coordinates Perspective function, The Transformation Matrix > name=Browser.getName().split(' ') // Browser.), as spacer for empty slot, Slots and the ::slot() Pseudo-element > browsers I could more easily specify mode=0 for FreeWRL. > getVersion returns 4.4.0 we previously had mode=2. > problem (probably relates to Contact only). > welder script changes in order to get around the setByVertexTransform > ok no success yet but I believe we've made some progress. > To: 'doug sanden' 'Development for the FreeWRL X3D viewer.' M3.getTransform(pos_vl5_changed,rot_vl5_changed) // -Original Message. * closer to supporting web3d v4, needs sound library and several smaller items to finish.įreeWRL-develop mailing a bug in angel.wrl avatar line 1239. builds for desktop windows 11 via recent visual studio glb files directly, or indirectly through Inline url I do go through the X3D public mailing list every once in a while to see what's new. ![]() Subject: Re: new feature: gltf_loaderĭoug, you've done great work here. To: Development for the FreeWRL X3D viewer. Its drifting toward ease of maintenance, at the cost of high GPU and CPU loads. Maybe a flavor of freewrl: it seemed to be designed with industrial strength in mind from the beginning and when I implement something, and I can choose between a short-cut or full industrial strength, I'll go industrial if I can.īut lately its become less suitable for running on small devices, with high GPU loads (but magnificent shader flexibility), and high CPU loads with less hard-to-maintain optimization. That would make it easier to 'refactor' code: make a change, run automated test suite, roll back if it broke something etc.Īnd the other web3d browsers have changed, with view3dcene, x_ite and x3dom being top 3, maybe freewrl somewhere close just based on number of components completed -including your geospatial- and big talking developer who shows up from time to time sounding like he knows something. I really need automated or semi-automated testing, so when I make a change that breaks something I know sooner, can roll back. And I don't always understand old code and can get into trouble. I haven't done sound yet which is big (sound bounces off geometry, echoes). Web3d specs v4 is bigger with physics based rendering / metalics, gltf-related etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |